PROPERTY
The core of the graph. Every property in the Nordics with designation, address, areas, and coordinates.
Source: Lantmäteriet / MML / [DK/NO-register]
The Property Graph
Kliva is built on a graph database where every data point is a node with real relationships — not tables that happen to share an ID. That is what lets you connect buyer to seller, company to board, and zoning plans to future deals. Full coverage today in Sweden and Finland.
How the data is truly connected. Click a node to center the graph and see its relationships. Click in the empty space to reset.
Access to the graph
Same data, fewer steps. Quick Search indexes every entity in the Property Graph — properties, owners, groups, tenants, transactions and municipalities — and matches on designation, name, registration number and address in the same query.
Explore Quick Search556626-1920 · Group Parent Company
86 properties · 364 433 m² GFA · Solvency Ratio 38 %
556053-7515 · Subsidiary
12 properties · Revenue 2 140 MSEK
Stockholm · Södermalm
9,480 sqm · Einar Mattsson AB
2023-11-14 · Einar Mattsson AB → Rikshem AB
418,000,000 SEK · 44,120 SEK/sqm
Illustration of Quick Search. Figures are sample data.
Graph database
A traditional relational database forces properties, owners, detailed development plans, and transactions into separate tables that must be joined for every query. The more hops — from property to owner to group to other holdings — the slower and more fragile the result.
Kliva is built on a graph database. Every property, company, detailed development plan, and transaction is aNode, and the relationships between them areedges with their own meaning —OWNED BY, SOLD IN, COVERED BY. Traversing multiple hops is a primitive operation, not a query to be optimized.
This is also why the model is the right match for AI. Large language models reason in entities and relations — the same structure as the graph. When an agent queries via our MCP server, it receives nodes and edges rather than table rows it must piece together. The context becomes smaller, answers more traceable, and the risk of hallucinations lower.
Deep queries
Follow an ownership chain all the way to the ultimate parent — the same question you otherwise answer manually in due diligence. Any number of hops, without the query slowing down.
Traceability
Every edge carries a source and a date. A valuation assumption can be traced back to the register it came from — by your team and by an agent.
Built for AI
The graph is served directly to your AI agents via MCP — as entities and relationships, not raw SQL.
Confidence levels
Every data point in Kliva is marked Gold, Silver or Bronze — so you know what is register data and what is modelled before it enters an underwriting model.
Directly from the primary source — registry data, title deed transfers, current zoning plans. Verified and referenced.
Derived from multiple sources or with a known delay — clearly marked with the underlying data.
Modeled or estimated — with stated assumptions, never presented as absolute fact.
Transparent uncertainty is not a weakness. It is what decision-grade data means.
Node index
The core of the graph. Every property in the Nordics with designation, address, areas, and coordinates.
Source: Lantmäteriet / MML / [DK/NO-register]
Registered owner — company or individual — with the full ownership chain upward through group structures.
Source: Lantmäteriet, Bolagsverket
Groups, parent companies, and subsidiaries linked to each owner. This allows portfolios to be tracked across company boundaries.
Source: Bolagsverket, PRH
Registered purchases and corporate transactions with price, date, parties, and financing. Validated and de-duplicated.
Source: Lantmäteriet, MML, [DK/NO]
Acquiring party in a transaction. Linked to the group structure to track buying patterns per actor.
Source: Lantmäteriet, Bolagsverket
Divesting party in a transaction. Connected to its entire previous holdings in the graph.
Source: Lantmäteriet, Bolagsverket
Tax assessment value, property type code, and assessment history per property. The basis for standard valuations and benchmarks.
Source: Skatteverket
Buildings on the property with areas, construction year, usage, and number of floors. Multiple buildings per property.
Source: Lantmäteriet, BBR, Matrikkelen
Energy performance, class, and proposed measures per building. Basis for sustainability reporting and CRREM analysis.
Source: Boverket
Rent levels per segment and submarket, aggregated from contracts and indices. Comparable benchmarks.
Source: Kliva market index, public sources
Current detailed development plans with usage, building rights, and restricted areas as separate, searchable layers. Georeferenced polygons, not PDFs.
Source: Municipal planning archives, Boverket
Permitted building volume per detailed development plan. GFA, height, and number of floors as structured attributes.
Source: Municipal planning archives
Permitted usage types (residential, office, retail, industrial) as separate layers. Searchable per polygon.
Source: Municipal planning archives
Land that cannot be built on — extracted as a separate geographical layer. This allows the remaining developable area to be calculated.
Source: Municipal planning archives
Municipal land allocations with actor, project, and timeline — linked to property and detailed development plan.
Source: Municipal allocation registries
Granted building permits with type, scope, and decision date — a signal that a project is about to start.
Source: Municipal building permit registries, Hubexo · Byggfakta
Active and planned construction projects with developer, contractor, volume, and timeline — across the Nordic region.
Source: Hubexo · Byggfakta
Physical climate risk per property: flood, cloudburst, landslide/erosion, and heat stress — modeled layers over coordinates.
Source: SMHI, MSB, climate models
Administrative unit in which the property is located — a bridge to planning archives, tax areas, and market statistics.
Source: SCB, Lantmäteriet
Yields, rent levels, and transaction volumes aggregated per municipality and submarket — Kliva market index.
Source: Kliva market index
Model valuations via cash flow and comparable sales method — traceably derived from transactions, rents, and yields in the graph.
Source: Kliva valuation engine
Board members and authorized signatories per company — allowing decision-makers to be traced through the entire ownership chain.
Source: Bolagsverket, PRH
The Swedish Tax Agency's type code classifies the property (apartment buildings, industrial, single-family homes, etc.) — the basis for segmentation.
Source: Skatteverket
Contract level with duration, index clause, and rent per sqm — anonymized basis for benchmarks.
Source: Kliva market index
Client of the construction project — linked to company structure to follow actors' pipeline over time.
Source: Hubexo · Byggfakta
General contractor or main contractor per project — market shares and relationships between actors.
Source: Hubexo · Byggfakta
Cloudburst and sea level rise scenarios modeled over the property's coordinates — retention and damage potential.
Source: SMHI, MSB
Future heat stress for the building based on climate scenarios — basis for cooling demand and comfort risk.
Source: SMHI climate scenarios
DCF model with rental income, operations, vacancy, and exit yield — derived from the graph's rent and yield data.
Source: Kliva valuation engine
Comparable transactions within the same segment and submarket — traceable to each underlying deal.
Source: Kliva valuation engine
Municipality's complete zoning plan and permit archive — indexed and searchable by property and polygon.
Source: Municipal plan archives
Decision date, processing time, and outcome per building permit — signals on the municipality's pace and practice.
Source: Municipal building permit registries
Companies' financial profile — revenue, profit, solvency, leverage, and cash flow — linked to each owner and buyer in the graph.
Source: Bolagsverket, PRH, Kliva financial index
Complete annual reports per company and year — income statement, balance sheet, notes, and auditor's report.
Source: Bolagsverket, PRH
Calculated key ratios per company: solvency, interest coverage ratio, return on equity — comparable over time and peers.
Source: Kliva financial index
Physical persons behind the companies — board members, CEOs, and authorized signatories — with the entire network of company engagements.
Source: Bolagsverket, PRH
CEO per company and time period — traceable across their entire career and across company boundaries.
Source: Bolagsverket, PRH
All other board and CEO engagements for the same person — making dependencies and conflicts of interest visible.
Source: Bolagsverket, PRH
Consolidated node for all property-level risk data — climate, environmental, social factors, and credit risk — calculated over the same coordinates and ownership chain as the rest of the graph.
Source: Kliva risk engine
Social index per DeSO area with five dimensions — service, safety, cohesion, well-being, and life chances.
Source: SCB, BRÅ, Polisen, Boverket
Environmental risks and restrictions on and around the property. This includes contaminated land, radon, noise, protected nature, and cultural environments.
Source: County Administrative Boards, SGU, Swedish EPA, National Heritage Board
Counterparty risk for owners and tenants. This includes credit ratings, payment remarks, and bankruptcy risk linked to contracts and cash flow.
Source: Ebie, Bolagsverket, PRH
Pluvial flooding during intense rainfall. This includes modeled water depth and flow paths across the property surface.
Source: MSB pluvial flood mapping, municipal mapping
Coastal flooding from elevated mean sea level and storm surges. This includes scenarios until 2050 and 2100.
Source: SMHI, Lantmäteriet elevation data
Fluvial flooding from lakes and watercourses. This includes 50-, 100-, and 200-year flows, and calculated maximum flow.
Source: MSB flood mapping
Changes in groundwater levels. This indicates risk of moisture intrusion in basements and subsidence from falling levels.
Source: SGU
Chronic drought according to climate scenarios. This affects foundations, green spaces, and local water supply.
Source: SMHI climate scenarios
Water stress in the area. This refers to supply in relation to extraction, relevant for operations and taxonomy requirements.
Source: SGU, SMHI
Acute risk: number of days above threshold temperature per year in current and future climates.
Source: SMHI climate scenarios
Cold snaps, frost cycles, and permafrost. This affects construction, energy demand, and maintenance intervals.
Source: SMHI
Chronic change in mean temperature and temperature variability according to RCP 4.5 and 8.5.
Source: SMHI climate scenarios
Acute wind risk. This includes gust winds and storm frequency at the property location.
Source: SMHI
Chronic change in wind patterns according to climate scenarios. This impacts design load and facade wear.
Source: SMHI climate scenarios
Stability risk in slopes and fine-grained soils. Modeled based on the property's geotechnics and inclination.
Source: SGI, SGU
Coastal and soil erosion over time. Particularly along the coast and waterways.
Source: SGI, SGU
Ground subsidence and settlement. Soil type, foundation depth, and historical movement.
Source: SGU, SGI
Avalanche risk in mountainous areas. Part of Appendix A's fixed mass risks.
Source: Naturvårdsverket, MSB
RCP 4.5 and 8.5 with time horizons 2030, 2050, and 2100. This is the scenario basis for each climate layer calculation.
Source: IPCC, SMHI
Distance to groceries, pharmacies, healthcare, schools, and public transport. Calculated from the property's coordinates.
Source: OpenStreetMap, Trafiklab
Reported residential burglaries and assaults per 100,000 inhabitants. Also, perceived safety according to NTU.
Source: BRÅ, Polisen
Association participation (LOK-stöd) and municipal election turnout. Indicators of local social cohesion.
Source: Riksidrottsförbundet, Valmyndigheten
Disposable median income and overcrowding according to norm 2, per DeSO area.
Source: SCB
Education level and long-term unemployment in the area. Structural conditions over time.
Source: SCB, Arbetsförmedlingen
Potentially contaminated areas with risk class and previous activity. Linked to the property's polygon.
Source: Länsstyrelsen EBH-stödet
Ground radon classification based on soil type and bedrock. High, normal, or low-risk land.
Source: SGU
Road, rail, and air traffic noise in equivalent daily levels. Impacts residential building rights and detailed development plan review.
Source: Trafikverket, kommunala bullerkarteringar
Levels of NO₂ and particulates in relation to environmental quality standards.
Source: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, SLB-analys
Wildfire risk around the property. Modeled based on vegetation, topography, and climate.
Source: Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB), Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI)
Shoreline protected zones that limit building rights. 100 or 300 meters, with municipal exemptions.
Source: County Administrative Board, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
Nature reserves, Natura 2000, and biotope protection areas that affect or border the property.
Source: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
Findings of protected species in the local area. A common reason for delayed planning review.
Source: Swedish Species Information Centre (SLU)
Water protection areas and water bodies with regulations governing land use.
Source: County Administrative Board, VISS
National interests for cultural heritage management, listed buildings, and protection regulations in the plan.
Source: Swedish National Heritage Board
Registered ancient remains within the property. Requires permit review before groundworks.
Source: Swedish National Heritage Board Fornsök
Credit rating and financial key figures for companies and tenants. Updated continuously.
Source: Ebie
Rating per counterparty with history. Linked to company structure to show group risk.
Source: Ebie
Credit risk per tenant weighted against the contract's share of rental income. Shows where cash flow is sensitive.
Source: Ebie, Kliva contract data
Registered payment remarks and debt balance per company.
Source: Ebie, Swedish Enforcement Authority
Modeled probability of insolvency within twelve months, based on financial data and history.
Source: Ebie, Kliva financial index
Rental income minus operating and maintenance costs per asset. The basis for yield and DCF.
Source: Kliva valuation engine, property system
Actual and standardized operating costs per square meter — electricity, heating, water/sewer, property management, and administration.
Source: Property management system, Kliva benchmark
Economic and area-based vacancy per asset and segment — historical data and future assumptions.
Source: Property management system, Kliva market index
Required yield per segment and submarket, derived from completed transactions.
Source: Kliva market index
Required yield at the end of the calculation period — determines the residual value in the cash flow model.
Source: Kliva valuation engine
Planned investments and maintenance needs over the calculation period — including energy efficiency measures.
Source: Property management system, Kliva valuation engine
Kliva syncs with the client's own systems. Rents, contracts, and costs are used in the valuation.
Source: Kliva integrations
Sync of contracts, rents, and property data from Hogia Fastighet.
Source: Hogia
Sync of contracts, tenants, and property data from Pigello.
Source: Pigello
FDS API for property and title deed data directly into the graph.
Source: FDS
Coverage
Sources per market
Land registry, legal title transactions, assessment data, corporate data, detailed development plans, and building permits.
Cadastral and title registers, company data, zoning plan data (asemakaava).
Construction projects and building permits in Sweden and Finland in collaboration with Hubexo · Byggfakta.
How we validate
We fetch data from the registry, not from aggregators. No data point exists without a source reference.
Transactions are verified, corporate structures are linked to assets, and discrepancies are flagged before data enters the platform.
Register changes are reflected in Kliva within 24 hours. Some sources update on the authority's own cycle — we always show the date per data point.
The team behind the data
Behind the pipelines is a data team that reviews anomalies, verifies transactions, and quality assures sources — so both your team and your AI agents can trust every data point.
The same data in the platform, via API and via MCP
All data in Kliva is available through the platform, through the API and through our MCP server — your own AI agents work on the same verified data as your team.
MCP & AI agentsKliva support
We usually reply within minutes
Hi, how can we help?
Ask a question or pick a shortcut below.
Cookies & privacy
We use strictly necessary cookies to ensure the website functions correctly. Other categories are disabled until you actively consent to them. Read more.